A leśniewskian language for the nominalistic theory of substance and accident
Topoi 2 (1):99-109 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJulia Annas (1977). Aristotle on Substance, Accident and Plato's Forms. Phronesis 22 (2):146-160.
Henry R. Burke (1936). Substance and Accident in the Philosophy of Descartes. The New Scholasticism 10 (4):338-382.
Matthew J. Kelly (1976). “Subject,” “Substance,” and “Accident” in St. Thomas. The New Scholasticism 50 (2):232-236.
W. Donald Oliver (1954). Essence, Accident, and Substance. Journal of Philosophy 51 (23):719-730.
Richard Cross (2008). Some Varieties of Semantic Externalism in Duns Scotus's Cognitive Psychology. Vivarium 46 (3):275-301.
Ken Akiba (1998). Nominalistic Metalogic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (1):35-47.
Peter Simons (1984). A Brentanian Basis for Lesniewskian Logic. Logique Et Analyse 27:297-308.
Barry Smith (1987). The Substance of Brentano's Ontology. Topoi 6 (1):39-49.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,037 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
