Defining privacy in employee health screening cases: Ethical ramifications concerning the employee/employer relationship [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):315 - 325 (1994)
Issues of privacy and employee health screening rank as two of the most important ethical concerns organizations will face in the next five years. Despite the increasing numbers of social scientists researching personal privacy and the current focus on workplace privacy rights as one of the most dynamic areas of employment law, the concept of privacy remains relatively abstract. Understanding how the courts define privacy and use the expectation of privacy standards is paramount given the strategic importance of the law as a legal socializing agent. This article reports on two federal court decisions involving employer drug and HIV testing whose determinations relied on assumptions about the psychological dimensions of privacy. How the courts define privacy, the outcome of this definition and the ethical ramifications as it affects the employee/employer relationship are discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Patricia Werhane (1988). Persons, Rights, and Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):336-340.
Michael C. Keeley (1990). [Book Review] a Social-Contract Theory of Organizations. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (3):681-682.
Kenneth R. Conklin (1976). Privacy: Should There Be A Right To It? Educational Theory 26 (3):263-270.
Alan F. Westin (1970). Privacy and Freedom. Science and Society 34 (3):360-363.
Citations of this work BETA
Leigh A. Clark & Sherry J. Roberts (2010). Employer's Use of Social Networking Sites: A Socially Irresponsible Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):507 - 525.
Leigh A. Clark & Sherry J. Roberts (2010). Employer’s Use of Social Networking Sites: A Socially Irresponsible Practice. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):507-525.
Similar books and articles
Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander (1999). Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
Kevin W. Mossholder, William F. Giles & Mark A. Wesolowski (1991). Information Privacy and Performance Appraisal: An Examination of Employee Perceptions and Reactions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):151 - 156.
Lars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke & Terry W. Noel (2007). The Impact of Individual Ethics on Reactions to Potentially Invasive HR Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):201 - 214.
Adam D. Moore (2000). Employee Monitoring and Computer Technology. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):697-709.
Roger Eugene Karnes (2009). A Change in Business Ethics: The Impact on Employer–Employee Relations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):189 - 197.
Anders J. Persson & Sven Ove Hansson (2003). Privacy at Work – Ethical Criteria. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):59 - 70.
Dan Davidson (1988). Employee Testing: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (3):211 - 217.
Michael Cranford (1998). Drug Testing and the Right to Privacy: Arguing the Ethics of Workplace Drug Testing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1805-1815.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #53,848 of 1,796,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #347,907 of 1,796,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?