External justifications and institutional roles

Journal of Philosophy 93 (1):28-36 (1996)
In his paper "Role Obligations," Michael Hardimon defends an account of the nature and justification of institutional obligations that he takes to be clearly superior to the "standard" voluntarist view. Hardimon argues that this standard view presents a "misleading and distorted" picture of role obligations (and of morality generally); and in its best form he claims this view still "leaves out" of its understanding of even contractual role obligations an "absolutely vital factor". I argue against Hardimon that a related version of this "standard view" of institutional obligations is "standard" for a very good reason - namely, that it is true.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI jphil199693147
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Avery H. Kolers (2012). Dynamics of Solidarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (4):365-383.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

48 ( #99,300 of 1,940,954 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #457,798 of 1,940,954 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.