Fitness requirements for scientific theories
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):355-365 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAndre Ariew (2009). What Fitness Can't Be. Erkenntnis 71 (3):289 - 301.
André Ariew & R. C. Lewontin (2004). The Confusions of Fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):347-363.
Thomas Nickles (1980). Scientific Problems: Three Empiricist Models. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:3 - 19.
Hans Halvorson (2012). What Scientific Theories Could Not Be. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Nicholas Maxwell, Non-Empirical Requirements Scientific Theories Must Satisfy: Simplicity, Unification, Explanation, Beauty. PhilSci Archive.
John Cassidy (1978). Philosophical Aspects of the Group Selection Controversy. Philosophy of Science 45 (4):575-594.
Klaus Henle (1991). Some Reflections on Evolutionary Theories, with a Classification of Fitness. Acta Biotheoretica 39 (2).
James Maclaurin, Fitness: Philosophical Problems. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.
Wei-Min Shen & Herbert A. Simon (1993). Fitness Requirements for Scientific Theories Containing Recursive Theoretical Terms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):641-652.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
