Inquiry 26 (2):231 – 232 (1983)
|Abstract||Professor Aubert's ?three?stage rocket? (Inquiry, Vol. 26 , No. 1) has reached periodic orbit. His comments on my earlier reply to his critique of my election predictions paper simply repeat arguments I have already refuted. In this note, I limit myself largely to pointing out Professor Aubert's misconceptions of what my position actually is. I find no reasons for revising the views stated in my original election predictions paper, nor any reasons for thinking that paper violated norms of scientific method that prevail in the natural sciences|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
N. Scott Arnold (1987). Final Reply to Professor Schweickart. Economics and Philosophy 3 (02):335-.
Roger C. Buck (1963). Reflexive Predictions. Philosophy of Science 30 (4):359-369.
Nkeonye Otakpor (1988). "Election Tribunals, Election Petitions and Justice. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (3):20-30.
Adolf Grunbaum (1963). Comments on Professor Roger Buck's Paper "Reflexive Predictions.". Philosophy of Science 30 (4):370-.
Adolf Grünbaum (1963). Comments on Professor Roger Buck's Paper "Reflexive Predictions.". Philosophy of Science 30 (4):370-372.
Michael K. Miller, Guanchun Wang, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni & Daniel N. Osherson, Wishful Thinking and Social Inﬂuence in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.
Karl Egil Aubert (1982). The Role of Mathematics in the Exploration of Reality. Inquiry 25 (3):353 – 359.
Karl Egil Aubert (1983). Ii. Mathematical Modelling of Election Predictions: Comments to Simon 's Reply. Inquiry 26 (1):132 – 134.
Herbert A. Simon (1982). Election Predictions: Reply. Inquiry 25 (3):361 – 364.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-03-05
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?