Metasemantics and Objectivity
In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Law: Metaphysics, Meaning, and Objectivity, Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy, Volume 2 (2007)
| Abstract | It is shown that the most plausible metasemantics for a typical common noun provides materials for a transcendental argument for objectivity: the very possibility that a typical common noun should have its significance requires that there be an objective measure of similarity among instances of the relevant kind. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Hawthorne (2007). Craziness and Metasemantics. Philosophical Review 116 (3):427-440.
Aaron James (2012). Constructing Protagorean Objectivity. In Jimmy Lenman & Yonatan Shemmer (eds.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Brian Leiter (ed.) (2001). Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Ryan (2001). Journalistic Ethics, Objectivity, Existential Journalism, Standpoint Epistemology, and Public Journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):3 – 22.
Felix Mühlhölzer (1988). On Objectivity. Erkenntnis 28 (2):185 - 230.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Evelyn Wortsman Deluty (2005). Wittgenstein's Paradox. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):87-102.
Heather Douglas (2004). The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese 138 (3):453 - 473.
Stephen Gaukroger (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-09-16Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
