Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218 (1998)
|Abstract||This paper examines the thesis that human labor creates property rights in or from previously unowned objects by virtue of labor's power to make new things. This thesis is considered for two possible roles: first, as a thesis to which John Locke might have been committed in his writings on property; and second, as a thesis of independent plausibility that could serve as part of a defensible contemporary theory of property rights. Understanding Locke as committed to the thesis of makers' rights has seemed to many of the best known recent Locke scholars to explain and unify Locke's various claims about property in a way that more traditional "labor-mixing" interpretations cannot. This paper argues that there is in fact no convincing evidence in Locke's texts to suggest any commitment to the thesis of makers' rights for humans.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Walter R. Ott (2002). Locke and Signification. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:449-473.
Tibor R. Machan (2009). Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Gopal Sreenivasan (1995). The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford University Press.
Gordon Hull, Clearing the Rubbish: Locke, the Waste Proviso, and the Moral Justification of Intellectual Property.
Herman T. Tavani (2005). Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2).
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Rowan Cruft (2006). Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights. Utilitas 18 (2):154-172.
James Tully (1980). A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #31,946 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?