Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (6):595-607 (2005)
|Abstract||Sagoff [Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2005), 215–236] argues, against growing empirical evidence, that major environmental impacts of non-native species are unproven. However, many such impacts, including extinctions of both island and continental species, have both been demonstrated and judged by the public to be harmful. Although more public attention has been focused on non-native animals than non-native plants, the latter more often cause ecosystem-wide impacts. Increased regulation of introduction of non-native species is, therefore, warranted, and, contra Sagoff’s assertions, invasion biologists have recently developed methods that greatly aid prediction of which introduced species will harm the environment and thus enable more efficient regulation. The fact that introduced species may increase local biodiversity in certain instances has not been shown to result in desired changes in ecosystem function. In other locales, they decrease biodiversity, as they do globally.|
|Keywords||biodiversity ecosystem function introduced species invasion non-native species prediction risk assessment Sagoff|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Markku Oksanen & Juhani Pietarinen (eds.) (2004). Philosophy and Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press.
Annie L. Booth & Harvey L. Jacobs (1990). Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation for Environmental Consciousness. Environmental Ethics 12 (1):27-43.
Claus Emmeche, Bioinvasion, Globalization, and the Contingency of Cultural and Biological Diversity - Some Ecosemiotic Observations.
Shana Sieber, Patrícia Medeiros & Ulysses Albuquerque (2011). Local Perception of Environmental Change in a Semi-Arid Area of Northeast Brazil: A New Approach for the Use of Participatory Methods at the Level of Family Units. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):511-531.
Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque (2011). Local Perception of Environmental Change in a Semi-Arid Area of Northeast Brazil: A New Approach for the Use of Participatory Methods at the Level of Family Units. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):511-531.
Colette R. Palamar (2006). Restorashyn: Ecofeminist Restoration. Environmental Ethics 28 (3):285-301.
Isis Brook (2003). Making Here Like There: Place Attachment, Displacement and the Urge to Garden. Ethics, Place and Environment 6 (3):227 – 234.
Mark Sagoff (2009). Environmental Harm: Political Not Biological. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):81-88.
M. Zisenis (2012). EU DAISIE Research Project: Wanted—Death Penalty to Keep Native Species Competitive? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):597-606.
Mark Sagoff (2005). Do Non-Native Species Threaten the Natural Environment? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):215-236.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,748 of 739,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?