Negotiating the therapeutic gap: Prenatal diagnostics and termination of pregnancy in Sri lanka [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):207-215 (2007)
In Sri Lanka, termination of pregnancy, other than in extreme circumstances, is strictly illegal. Among the public and large sections of the medical community there is widespread support for some degree of liberalization of the law, particularly where this relates to serious genetic conditions which can be identified prenatally. Tension emerges out of a publicly maintained conservatism on issues of abortion on the one hand and a growing disconnection from unregulated practices of termination in the private sector on the other. Social science approaches have much to contribute when understanding the ‘therapeutic gap’ that opens up and, in particular, the way that local ideas of fate, destiny and how suffering might be ameliorated become blended with the predictive power of genetic testing.
|Keywords||Abortion Induced Genetic screening Sri Lanka Bioethics Social sciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bob Simpson (2007). On Parrots and Thorns: Sri Lankan Perspective on Genetics, Science and Personhood. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 15 (1):41-49.
Rohan Jayasekara, Gina Barrett Kristl & Wladimir Wertelecki (1988). Acceptance of Genetic Services: A Study of Physicians in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Journal of Biosocial Science 20 (1):1.
Peter Harvey (2001). An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics. Philosophy 76 (295):168-171.
Damien Keown (2001). Buddhism and Bioethics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Angela Ballantyne, Ainsley Newson, Florencia Luna & Richard Ashcroft (2009). Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities: Is It Ethical to Provide One Without the Other? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):48-56.
Daniel Sperling (2009). From Iran to Latin America: Must Prenatal Diagnosis Necessarily Be Provided With Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):61-63.
Similar books and articles
Beatrice Bayle, Conserving Mural Paintings in Thailand and Sri Lanka: Conservation Policies and Restoration Practice in Social and Historical Context.
Thalia Arawi & Anwar Nassar (2011). Prenatally Diagnosed Foetal Malformations and Termination of Pregnancy: The Case of Lebanon. Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):40-47.
J. Savulescu (2001). Is Current Practice Around Late Termination of Pregnancy Eugenic and Discriminatory? Maternal Interests and Abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):165-171.
Asaf Toker (2009). Superior Termination of Pregnancy Committees – Are We Doing the Right Thing? Bioethics 23 (5):263-264.
Kurt Bayertz (1998). What's Special About Molecular Genetic Diagnostics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):247 – 254.
Ran Banda Seneviratne (1999). A New Political Concept for Sri Lanka. Friends of Nrw [Sic] Direction.
Zoltan Papp (1989). Genetic Counseling and Termination of Pregnancy in Hungary. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #227,548 of 1,724,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,547 of 1,724,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?