Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||My subject is the theory of blame recently propounded by George Sher in his book, In Praise of Blame. I argue that although Sher has succeeded in capturing a number of genuine features of the concept of blame, there is an important element that he has omitted, which is the fact that necessarily, when A blames B for something and expresses this to B, A will realise that B is likely to find this unpleasant. The inclusion of the latter element renders the question of whether any agent ever deserves blame a more open one than Sher allows.|
|Keywords||Blame Moral responsibility Determinism Desert Sher|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
George Sher (2001). Blame for Traits. Noûs 35 (1):146–161.
Raymond Dennehy (2007). In Praise of Blame—George Sher. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):125-127.
J. E. Tiles (2008). In Praise of Blame - By George Sher. Philosophical Books 49 (1):78-80.
G. Watson (2008). Review: George Sher: In Praise of Blame. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (466):515-520.
J. Etiles (2008). In Praise of Blame - by George Sher. Philosophical Books 49 (1):78-80.
Matthew Talbert (2011). Unwitting Behavior and Responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):139-152.
Michael McKenna & Aron Vadakin (2008). George Sher,In Praise of Blame:In Praise of Blame. Ethics 118 (4):751-756.
Angela M. Smith (2008). Character, Blameworthiness, and Blame: Comments on George Sher's in Praise of Blame. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):31 - 39.
Pamela Hieronymi (2008). Review: Sher's Defense of Blame. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):19 - 30.
Added to index2009-02-06
Total downloads68 ( #15,782 of 731,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,271 of 731,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?