Philosophy of Science 37 (1):16-26 (1970)
|Abstract||The task of axiomatizing physical theories has attracted, in recent years, some interest among both empirical scientists and logicians. However, the axiomatizations produced by either one of these two groups seldom appear satisfactory to the members of the other. It is the purpose of this paper to develop an approach that will satisfy the criteria of both, hence permit us to construct axiomatizations that will meet simultaneously the standards and needs of logicians and of empirical scientists|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
W. Aitken & J. A. Barrett (2010). A Note on the Physical Possibility of Transfinite Computation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):867-874.
Leora Morgenstern (2001). Mid-Sized Axiomatizations of Commonsense Problems: A Case Study in Egg Cracking. Studia Logica 67 (3):333-384.
Jeffrey Alan Barrett (2008). Approximate Truth and Descriptive Nesting. Erkenntnis 68 (2):213 - 224.
Alyssa Ney (2009). Physical Causation and Difference-Making. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):737-764.
William F. Brewer (2001). Models in Science and Mental Models in Scientists and Nonscientists. Mind and Society 2 (2):33-48.
Paul Ernest (1990). The Meaning of Mathematical Expressions: Does Philosophy Shed Any Light on Psychology? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (4):443-460.
Sebastian Lutz (2012). On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View. HOPOS 2 (1):77–120.
C. U. Moulines (2010). Metatheoretical Structuralism: A General Program for Analyzing Science. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 20 (2-3):255-268.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,769 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?