Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 27 (4):271 - 277 (1975)
|Abstract||Alan gewirth has argued that the fanatical defender of discriminatory moral principles can be convicted of inconsistency by appeal to the principle of categorial consistency (pcc). The pcc requires that equal weight be given to everyone's possession of the categorial features of action, I.E., The capacity to act voluntarily and the capacity to act purposively. In reply, I argue that, Contrary to gewirth, It has not been shown either that the fanatic is committed to the pcc or that the pcc is a presupposition of rational moral evaluation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paolo Liberatore (2007). Consistency Defaults. Studia Logica 86 (1):89 - 110.
Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Christian Retoré & Sylvain Salvati (2010). A Faithful Representation of Non-Associative Lambek Grammars in Abstract Categorial Grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (2):185-200.
Brent Mundy (1989). Elementary Categorial Logic, Predicates of Variable Degree, and Theory of Quantity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (2):115 - 140.
Eric Dietrich (2001). AI, Concepts, and the Paradox of Mental Representation, with a Brief Discussion of Psychological Essentialism. J. Of Exper. And Theor. AI 13 (1):1-7.
Gopal Sreenivasan (2008). Character and Consistency: Still More Errors. Mind 117 (467):603-612.
Henry B. Veatch (1976). Paying Heed to Gewirth's Principle of Categorial Consistency. Ethics 86 (4):278-287.
N. Fotion (1968). Gewirth and Categorial Consistency. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (72):262-264.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #248,102 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?