When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Problem of Fit Rather than Failure for Voluntary Management Standards [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):85-95 (2012)
Voluntary management standards for social and environmental performance ideally help to define and improve firms’ related capabilities. These standards, however, have largely failed to improve such performance as intended. Over-emphasis on institutional factors leading to adoption of these standards has neglected the role of firms’ existing capabilities. External pressures can drive firms to adopt standards more than their technical capacity to employ them. This can lead to problems of “fit” between institutional requirements and a firm’s existing capabilities . We describe a conceptual model that considers the impact of an interaction between a firm’s institutional requirements and its existing capabilities on standards failure. We suggest solutions that align institutional requirements to appropriate governance forms as a means to improve standards success. We contribute to theory by describing the role of firms’ internal capabilities to the success of voluntary management standards and the reliability of self-regulation generally.
|Keywords||Voluntary standards Institutional theory Operational capabilities Social and environmental performance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Krista Bondy, Dirk Matten & Jeremy Moon (2004). The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three‐Country Comparative Study. Business and Society Review 109 (4):449-477.
Dima Jamali & Ben Neville (2011). Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):599-621.
Martin Mueller, Virginia Gomes dos Santos & Stefan Seuring (2009). The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):509-523.
Dima Jamali (2010). MNCs and International Accountability Standards Through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):617 - 640.
Nicole Darnall (2006). Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification. Business and Society 45 (3):354-381.
Citations of this work BETA
Pavel Castka & Charles J. Corbett (forthcoming). Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage. Journal of Business Ethics.
Simone de Colle, Adrian Henriques & Saras Sarasvathy (2013). The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-15.
Laurence Vigneau, Michael Humphreys & Jeremy Moon (2015). How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics 131 (2):469-486.
Similar books and articles
Ivan Montiel (2005). The Impact of Institutional Pressures to Adopt ISO 14001 Among Automotive Suppliers in North America. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:211-216.
Maria J. Montes-Sancho (2011). An Institutional Perspective on the Diffusion of International Management System Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):103-132.
Charles J. Woelfel (1986). Standards of Ethical Conduct for Management Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):365 - 371.
Petra Christmann (2011). Decoupling of Standard Implementation From Certification. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):73-102.
Bryan W. Husted & Ivan Montiel (2007). Environmental Performance Implications of Certified Management Standards in Mexico. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:314-317.
James J. Hoffman (1998). Evaluating International Ethical Climates: A Goal Programming Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1861-1869.
Cathy A. Rusinko & John O. Matthews (2008). Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:335-342.
Nuttaneeya Ann Torugsa, Wayne O'Donohue & Rob Hecker (2012). Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence From an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):483-500.
Margaret Reynolds (1999). Standards and Professional Practice: The TTA and Initial Teacher Training. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3):247 - 260.
Ivan Montiel & Bryan W. Husted (2009). The Adoption of Voluntary Environmental Management Programs in Mexico: First Movers as Institutional Entrepreneurs. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):349 - 363.
Marie-France B.-Turcotte, Stéphane de Belleeuille & Frank de Hond (2007). Gildan Inc. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:357-362.
Geoff Moore (2005). Regulatory Perspectives on Business Ethics in the Curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (4):349 - 356.
Jill M. D'Aquila (2001). Financial Accountants' Perceptions of Management's Ethical Standards. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (3):233 - 244.
Martin Mueller, Virginia Gomes dos Santos & Stefan Seuring (2009). The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):509 - 523.
Added to index2012-01-24
Total downloads20 ( #177,317 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #426,071 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?