An argument for consequentialism
Philosophical Perspectives 6:399-421 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.
Tim Mulgan (2001). The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2001). What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder. Utilitas 13 (03):342-.
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethical Theory. Continuum.
Campbell Brown (2005). Blameless Wrongdoing and Agglomeration: A Response to Streumer. Utilitas 17 (2):222-225.
Andrew Gleeson (2005). Pettit on Consequentialism and Universalizability. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):261-275.
Frances Howard-Snyder (1996). A New Argument for Consequentialism? A Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong. Analysis 56 (2):111–115.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2009). How Strong is This Obligation? An Argument for Consequentialism From Concomitant Variation. Analysis 69 (3):438-442.
Dale Dorsey (2012). Consequentialism, Metaphysical Realism and the Argument From Cluelessness. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):48-70.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads82 ( #9,300 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
