A Distinction between Science and Philosophy

Essays in Philosophy (forthcoming)
Abstract Ever since Kant published his Critique of Pure Reason, most philosophers have taken the distinction between science and philosophy to depend upon the existence of a class of truths specially amenable to philosophical investigation. In recent times, Quine's arguments against the analytic- synthetic distinction have cast doubt over the existence of such a class of special philosophical truths and consequently many now doubt that there is a sharp distinction between science and philosophy. In this paper, I present a perfectly sharp distinction between science and philosophy which does not depend upon any distinction between philosophical and scientifi c truths.
Keywords Metaphilosophy  Semantic Holism  Quine
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
Nathan Sinclair (2012). A Dogma of Naturalism. Metaphilosophy 43 (5):551-566.
Robert Barrett (1965). Quine, Synonymy and Logical Truth. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):361-367.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-06-27

Total downloads

106 ( #5,453 of 549,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

26 ( #1,927 of 549,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums