Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 101 (3):385-395 (2011)
|Abstract||Recent figures reported by KPMG confirm the growing prevalence of corporate codes of ethics globally. Svensson et al. (Bus Ethics 18:389–407, 2009 ) in surveys of the largest corporations in Australia, Canada, and Sweden found a similar trend. The increased prevalence of corporate codes of ethics has been accompanied by heightened research interest in various aspects of these documents, e.g., the contents and focus of the codes. However, there is a paucity of research examining the effectiveness of these documents and the organizational infrastructure that accompany them. This study, based on a survey of Canada’s largest corporations, sought to empirically assess the determinants of the effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics by regressing managers’ perceptions of code effectiveness against various elements of ethics programs. It was found that, in a statistically significant model, eighteen independent variables explain 58.5% of the variance in the perceived effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics|
|Keywords||effectiveness of codes corporate codes of ethics determinants of code effectiveness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jang Singh, Göran Svensson, Greg Wood & Michael Callaghan (2011). A Longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Study of the Contents of Codes of Ethics of Australian, Canadian and Swedish Corporations. Business Ethics 20 (1):103-119.
Göran Svensson, Greg Wood, Jang Singh & Michael Callaghan (2009). Implementation, Communication and Benefits of Corporate Codes of Ethics: An International and Longitudinal Approach for Australia, Canada and Sweden. Business Ethics 18 (4):389-407.
M. Schwartz (2001). The Nature of the Relationship Between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):247 - 262.
Jang B. Singh (2006). A Comparison of the Contents of the Codes of Ethics of Canada's Largest Corporations in 1992 and 2003. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (1):17 - 29.
Mark S. Schwartz (2005). Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):27 - 44.
Mark John Somers (2001). Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship Between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):185 - 195.
Göran Svensson, Greg Wood, Jang Singh & Michael Callaghan (2009). A Cross-Cultural Construct of the Ethos of the Corporate Codes of Ethics: Australia, Canada and Sweden. Business Ethics 18 (3):253-267.
Mark S. Schwartz (2004). Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):323 - 343.
Cynthia Stohl, Michael Stohl & Lucy Popova (2009). A New Generation of Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):607 - 622.
Richard Leblanc (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness 2. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (2):106-112.
Ingo Winkler (2011). The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):653-665.
Margaret Anne Cleek & Sherry Lynn Leonard (1998). Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behavior? Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):619 - 630.
Maurica Lefebvre & Jang B. Singh (1992). The Content and Focus of Canadian Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):799 - 808.
Kenneth D. Butterfield (1996). The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):461-476.
Jane E. Salk (2006). Cross-Sector Alliance Learning and Effectiveness of Voluntary Codes of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (2):211-234.
Added to index2011-07-15
Total downloads19 ( #71,502 of 751,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 751,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?