David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 152 (3):385-411 (2011)
This paper advances three necessary conditions on a successful account of sentential negation. First, the ability to explain the constancy of sentential meaning across negated and unnegated contexts (the Fregean Condition). Second, the ability to explain why sentences and their negations are inconsistent, and inconsistent in virtue of the meaning of negation (the Semantic Condition). Third, the ability of the account to generalize regardless of the topic of the negated sentence (the Generality Condition). The paper discusses three accounts of negation available to moral expressivists. The first—the dominant commitment account—fails to meet the Fregean Condition. The two remaining accounts—commitment semantics and the expression account—satisfy all three conditions. A recent argument that the dominant commitment account is the only option available to expressivists is considered and rejected.
|Keywords||Negation Expressivism Frege–Geach problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen Barker (2006). Truth and the Expressing in Expressivism. In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. 299.
Gunnar Björnsson (2001). Why Emotivists Love Inconsistency. Philosophical Studies 104 (1):81 - 108.
Simon Blackburn (1988). Attitudes and Contents. Ethics 98 (3):501-517.
Simon Blackburn (2006). Antirealist Expressivism and Quasi-Realism. In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press. 146--162.
Simon Blackburn (1993). Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Neil Sinclair (2012). Moral Realism, Face-Values and Presumptions. Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):158-179.
Similar books and articles
Max Kölbel (1997). Expressivism and the Syntactic Uniformity of Declarative Sentences. Critica 29 (87):3–51.
Graham Priest (1999). Negation as Cancellation, and Connexive Logic. Topoi 18 (2):141-148.
Henriëtte De Swart & Ivan A. Sag (2002). Negation and Negative Concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (4):373 - 417.
Gabriel Sandu (1994). Some Aspects of Negation in English. Synthese 99 (3):345 - 360.
Mark Andrew Schroeder (2008/2010). Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism. Oxford University Press.
Mark Schroeder (2012). Skorupski on Being For. Analysis 72 (4):735-739.
Nicholas Unwin (1999). Quasi-Realism, Negation and the Frege-Geach Problem. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (196):337-352.
Mark Schroeder (2008). How Expressivists Can and Should Solve Their Problem with Negation. Noûs 42 (4):573-599.
Jacek Hawranek & Jan Zygmunt (1984). On the Degree of Complexity of Sentential Logics.II. An Example of the Logic with Semi-Negation. Studia Logica 43 (4):405 - 413.
Ernesto Napoli (2006). Negation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):233-252.
Added to index2009-12-02
Total downloads141 ( #6,004 of 1,102,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,013 of 1,102,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?