David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):245-248 (2011)
People with personality disorders should be treated fairly. Potential crime victims should be protected. That much is uncontroversial. The hard questions ask what is fair, when is protection adequate, and how should we achieve fairness and protection together. Peay outlines five main hurdles that the law must jump to reach these goals. All five raise serious challenges. To begin to address these challenges, we must first clarify what a personality disorder is. The notion of a personality disorder is defined very broadly in DSM-IV-TR as any inflexible, pervasive, enduring, stable, and early-onset pattern of experience and behavior that deviates markedly from cultural expectations, leads to clinically ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jill Peay (2011). Personality Disorder and the Law: Some Awkward Questions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):231-244.
Hanna Pickard (2011). What Is Personality Disorder? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):181-184.
Robert Kinscherff (2010). Proposition: A Personality Disorder May Nullify Responsibility for a Criminal Act. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):745-759.
Mike W. Martin (2010). Personality Disorders and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):127-129.
Peter Zachar (2011). The Clinical Nature of Personality Disorders: Answering the Neo-Szaszian Critique. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):191-202.
Jeanette Kennett & Steve Matthews (2003). Delusion, Dissociation and Identity. Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):31-49.
Louis C. Charland (2010). Medical or Moral Kinds? Moving Beyond a False Dichotomy. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):119-125.
Steve Pearce (2011). Answering the Neo-Szaszian Critique: Are Cluster B Personality Disorders Really So Different? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):203-208.
Stephen E. Braude (1996). Multiple Personality Disorder and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 3 (1):37-54.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Stephen Behnke (2000). Responsibility in Cases of Multiple Personality Disorder. Noûs 34 (s14):301-323.
James T. Lamiell (1987). The Psychology of Personality: An Epistemological Inquiry. Columbia University Press.
Stephen E. Braude (1996). Multiple Personality and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 3 (1):37-54.
Marga Reimer (2010). Moral Aspects of Psychiatric Diagnosis: The Cluster B Personality Disorders. Neuroethics 3 (2):173-184.
Added to index2011-09-29
Total downloads29 ( #63,238 of 1,099,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #33,157 of 1,099,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?