Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):36-37 (1998)
|Abstract||Converging psychophysical evidence suggests that the human visual system parses shapes into component parts for the purposes of object recognition. We examine the Schyns et al. claim of “creation” of features in light of recent work on part-based representations of visual shape, particularly the perceptual rules that human vision uses to parse shapes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey S. Bowers (1999). The Visual Categories for Letters and Words Reside Outside Any Informationally Encapsulated Perceptual System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):368-369.
James Tanaka (1998). Parts, Features, and Expertise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):37-38.
Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Haluk Ogmen, Jose Ramon & Jian Chen (2005). Unconscious and Conscious Priming by Forms and Their Parts. Visual Cognition 12 (5):720-736.
David R. Andresen & Chad J. Marsolek (1998). Chorus of K Prototypes or Discord of Contradictory Representations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):467-468.
David H. Sanford (1983). The Perception of Shape. In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Robert Briscoe (2008). Vision, Action, and Make‐Perceive. Mind and Language 23 (4):457-497.
Shimon Edelman & Sharon Duvdevani-Bar (1997). Similarity-Based Viewspace Interpolation and the Categorization of 3D Objects. In Proc. Edinburgh Workshop on Similarity and Categorization.
Charles Siewert (2006). Is the Appearance of Shape Protean? Psyche 12 (3):1-16.
Stevan Harnad (2005). To Cognize is to Categorize: Cognition is Categorization. In C. Lefebvre & H. Cohen (eds.), Handbook of Categorization. Elsevier.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?