David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (1) (2010)
Transgenic technologies avails new ways that alter plants and animals to be better suited for applications in food, feed, and processing. The ability to express foreign genes and proteins opens the door to producing many commercially important industrial and pharmaceutical products. However, despite the promise of these technologies, there are many concerns about the environmental impact of genetically engineered food plants and how to contain them. Risk assessment and monitoring are vital for this industry: the regulatory agencies aimed to monitor the specific environment and public health hazards associated with GE food and organisms. In the United States, the FDA, USDA, and EPA are responsible for these regulations. Several agencies in other countries also monitor GE foods and frame guidelines for the safe application of recombinant genes in agro-industries. This article gives an overview on the tracking of GE DNA in foods and the general public's concerns about them. The role of regulatory agencies are also summarized in regulating GE products while ensuring the public health
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nils Holtug (2001). The Harm Principle and Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):168-178.
Daniel Sperling (2010). Food Law, Ethics, and Food Safety Regulation: Roles, Justifications, and Expected Limits. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):267-278.
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP Usa.
John P. Gluck Mark T. Holdsworth (2008). FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):pp. 393-402.
John P. Gluck & Mark T. Holdsworth (2008). FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):393-402.
Kristen C. Nelson, David A. Andow & Michael J. Banker (2009). Problem Formulation and Option Assessment (PFOA) Linking Governance and Environmental Risk Assessment for Technologies: A Methodology for Problem Analysis of Nanotechnologies and Genetically Engineered Organisms. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (4):732-748.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Vandana Shiva (2009). Women and the Gendered Politics of Food. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):17-32.
Ed Soule (2004). The Precautionary Principle and the Regulation of U.S. Food and Drug Safety. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):333 – 350.
Renee B. Kim (2009). Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea: The Importance of Food Safety and Ethics in a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):141-152.
Lisa A. Bergin (2009). Latina Feminist Metaphysics and Genetically Engineered Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (3):257--271.
Michael Greger (2011). Transgenesis in Animal Agriculture: Addressing Animal Health and Welfare Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):451-472.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads15 ( #167,378 of 1,707,766 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,887 of 1,707,766 )
How can I increase my downloads?