David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 26 (3):461-477 (2011)
Reading Beauvoir's “Must We Burn Sade?” alongside the chapter called “Sexual Initiation” in The Second Sex, I argue that the problem with Sade is not his perversity, but his perpetual virginity. In The Second Sex, Beauvoir advances a new understanding of sexual initiation as a physical and spiritual movement toward the other, disqualifying any purely physical machination as sufficient to initiate one into “authentic erotic reality.” Sade's refusal of Eros as described in “Must We Burn Sade?” demonstrates that the Marquis's commitment to his characteristic Sadism in fact condemned him to a barren promiscuity, a trenchant and joyless virginity that he elected to perpetuate. Finally, I argue that we should reread Sadism not as a perversion but as based on the Greek model of the “virgin ailment.” As such, Sadism may turn out to be a more genuine and widespread threat than we ordinarily acknowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Debra Bergoffen (1996). The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities. State University of New York Press.
Judith Butler (2003). Beauvoir on Sade: Making Sexuality Into an Ethic. In Claudia Card (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press. 168--88.
Penelope Deutscher (2008). The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Ambiguity, Conversion, Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Fredrika Scarth (2004). The Other Within: Ethics, Politics, and the Body in Simone de Beauvoir. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karen Vintges (2001). 'Must We Burn Foucault?' Ethics as Art of Living: Simone de Beauvoir and Michel Foucault. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):165-181.
Gary Banham (2011). The Antimonies of Pure Practical Libertine Reason. Angelaki 15 (1):13-27.
Debra Berghoffen (2001). Menage à Trois: Freud, Beauvoir, and the Marquis de Sade. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):151-163.
Nancy Bauer (1999). The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities, And: Sex and Existence: Simone de Beauvoir's 'The Second Sex', And: Beauvoir and The Second Sex : Feminism, Race, and the Origins of Existentialism, And: Philosophy as Passion: The Thinking of Simone de Beauvoir (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):688-691.
Sara Heinämaa (1999). Simone de Beauvoir’s Phenomenology of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 14 (4):114-132.
Zeynep Direk (2011). Immanence and Abjection in Simone de Beauvoir. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):49-72.
Sara Heinämaa (1997). What is a Woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the Foundations of the Sexual Difference. Hypatia 12 (1):20-39.
Debra Bergoffen (2006). Sartre and the Word. Sartre Studies International 12 (2):83-91.
D. A. F. Sade (1999). Historia mego uwięzienia. Z listów Markiza de Sade do żony pisanych w Vincennes. Sztuka I Filozofia 17.
Karen Vintges (1999). Simone de Beauvoirs Phenomenology of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 14 (4):133-144.
Nancy Bauer (2001). Being-with as Being-Against: Heidegger Meets Hegel in the Second Sex. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):129-149.
Added to index2011-05-12
Total downloads22 ( #65,949 of 1,088,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?