|Abstract||0:52 <span class='Hi'>Peter</span> Singer: Killing a disabled infant is sometimes not wrong. Given that the infant, like any infant, is not a person, as I see it, I think that itâ€™s ethically defensible to say we do not have to continue its life. It doesnâ€™t have a right to life.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jerome L. Singer, Jefferson A. Singer & Peter Salovey (eds.) (1999). At Play in the Fields of Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Jerome L. Singer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chris Kaposy (2007). Can Infants Have Interests in Continued Life? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):301-330.
Anthony Skelton (2009). Review of Peter Singer The Life You Can Save. [REVIEW] The Globe and Mail: F11.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 310.
Michael Lockwood (1979). Singer on Killing and the Preference for Life. Inquiry 22 (1-4):157 – 170.
Peter Singer (2001). Hegel: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Peter Singer (2008). Interview - Peter Singer. The Philosophers' Magazine (40):59-60.
Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer (1983). Ng and Singer on Utilitarianism: A Reply. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):241 - 242.
Helga Kuhse (1994). Bioethics and the Limits of Tolerance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2).
Peter Singer (1979). Regan's Critique of Singer. Analysis 39 (3):118 - 119.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads14 ( #82,984 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?