David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (2):240-246 (2008)
This paper starts from a premise relating to the act of fictional writing about eugenics and the way it may be understood as the embodiment and enactment of social imaginaries. It proposes that literature frequently, if not habitually, expresses the underside of what is expressed in public discourse. That is, far from being the implement of state policy or intervention, it acts in counterpoint to the state, constituting a type of social fantasy in that it explores through the realm of the imagination what might happen. It becomes the arena for contestation, exploration, and nuancing as it essays how ideas from public, ‘real’ life, might transform when acted out. The paper considers two sorts of literary case. First it looks at that of ‘naïve’ literature, harnessed unashamedly to a specific sociological discourse of eugenics. Then, using primarily Ibsen, it considers a subset, the case of literature that does not set out to be explicitly in the service of the cause of eugenics, but is appropriated and disseminated from a platform of eugenics. Lastly, taking the example of Unamuno’s Amor y pedagogía the paper considers literature that exists in a quite different sphere of public awareness. It shows awareness of the arguments and precepts of eugenics and related beliefs and practices, but acts as a transitional space to enable such ideas to be entertained and thought about, without a requirement of acceptance or belief
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Berenstein (2004). Dividing in the Algebra of Compact Operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):817-829.
Sergio Fratarcangeli (2005). Elimination of Imaginaries in Expansions of O-Minimal Structures by Generic Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1150 - 1160.
Robert Sparrow (2011). Liberalism and Eugenics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Stephen Wilkinson (2007). Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta (2007). Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Charles Blattberg (2006). Modern Social Imaginaries. Dialogue 45 (1):183-185.
Jeremy S. Neill (2008). Review Essay: Charles Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries (Durham, Nc: Duke University Press, 2004), 215 Pp. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):575-580.
Jeffery L. Nicholas (2005). Modern Social Imaginaries. Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):454-456.
Bernard Yack (2005). Charles Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries:Modern Social Imaginaries. Ethics 115 (3):629-633.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #150,062 of 1,692,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,202 of 1,692,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?