The Epistemic Argument for Hedonism

Abstract
I defend hedonism about moral value by first presenting an argument for moral skepticism, and then showing that phenomenal introspection gives us a unique way to defeat the skeptical argument and establish pleasure's goodness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Neil Sinhababu, The Epistemic Argument for Hedonism
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Dale Dorsey (2011). The Hedonist's Dilemma. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):173-196.
Matthew Silverstein (2000). In Defense of Happiness. Social Theory and Practice 26 (2):279-300.
Joseph Mendola (2006). Intuitive Hedonism. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):441 - 477.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-07

Total downloads

673 ( #122 of 1,098,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

190 ( #143 of 1,098,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.