David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 469-470 (2009)
The overarching aim of this excellent book is to demonstrate the common ground between medieval logic and logical theories of the twentieth century by analyzing some important medieval approaches to three important topics in medieval logic and then showing that in each case, once we determine what is really going on in the medieval theory, it can be formalized in such a way as to show how it resembles one or more developments in twentieth-century logical theory. Analysis in terms of modern logical theory has a lot to offer the study of medieval logical theories, the author claims, and twentieth-century theory can learn some interesting lessons from examining its medieval counterparts. Much of the material in these specific discussions has been presented in earlier versions in the author's published articles. "The Philosophy of Formalization" , however, is new. English translations are used in the text, though the Latin is supplied in the footnotes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
L. M. De Rijk (1971). The Development of Suppositio Naturalis in Mediaeval Logic. Vivarium 9 (1):71-107.
C. Dutilh Novaes (2005). Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance. Synthese 145 (3):371 - 395.
Desmond Paul Henry (1964). Ockham, Suppositio , and Modern Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (4):290-292.
Joseph T. Clark (1952). Later Medieval Consequentiae. Philosophical Studies of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 3:53-53.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2011). Medieval Obligationes as a Theory of Discursive Commitment Management. Vivarium 49 (1-3):240-257.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2011). Disputation and Logic in the Medieval Treatises De Modo Opponendi Et Respondendi. Vivarium 49 (1-3):127-149.
Sara L. Uckelman (2013). Medieval Disputationes de Obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems. Argumentation 27 (2):143-166.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2006). Roger Swyneshed's Obligationes: A Logical Game of Inference Recognition? Synthese 151 (1):125 - 153.
Added to index2009-07-22
Total downloads19 ( #104,467 of 1,692,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,267 of 1,692,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?