“Utrum idem sint dicere et intelligere sive videre in mente”: Robert kilwardby, quaestiones in librum primum sententiarum
Graduate studies at Western
Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):253-268 (2007)
|Abstract||In his Questions I, qq. 35-36 Sent. Robert Kilwardby asks whether divine understanding (intelligere) is the same as the divine speaking (dicere), as Anselm says in Monologion, ch. 63, just as for us mental speaking (mentis locutio) is the same as the thinker's examination (inspectio cogitantis) or mental seeing (videre in mente). His answer is that neither for us nor for God is the equation correct, because understanding lacks an essential characteristic of speech, i.e. referentiality, and because speaking is active and understanding passive, which is reflected in the meanings (impositiones) and grammatical functions (modi significandi) of the corresponding expressions. Kilwardby does concede in his discussion of the speech of angels in II Sent. q. 56 that when inner speech does occur, and remains internal, it amounts to thought, though with the additional element of referentiality. I suggest that Kilwardby is unwilling accept Augustine's theory that thought is inner speech, as Anselm does, because it would require him to reject Aristotelian-style philosophical psychology.|
|Keywords||ANSELM MODES OF SIGNIFYING SPEECH OF ANGELS DIVINE WORD|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Fitzgerald (2008). Logic and Ontology in the Syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 482-483.
Anthony J. Celano (1999). Robert Kilwardby on the Relation of Virtue to Happiness. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):149-162.
S. Harrison Thomson (1938). Robert Kilwardby's Commentaries In Priscianum and In Barbarismum Donati. The New Scholasticism 12 (1):52-65.
D. E. Sharp (1934). The De Ortu Scientiarum of Robert Kilwardby (D. 1279). The New Scholasticism 8 (1):1-30.
S. Harrison Thomson (1938). Studies in the Life of Robert Kilwardby, O. P. The New Scholasticism 12 (2):190-194.
Robert Kilwardby (1987). On Time and Imagination =. Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.
Peter King (forthcoming). Abelard's Answers to Porphyry. Documenti e studi.
Catherine Nolan (2009). Ratio, Intelligere, and Cogitare in Anselm's Ontological Argument. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:199-208.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,097 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?