David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 1 (3):235-248 (2004)
The Science Wars have not involved any violence, nor even threats of violence. Thus the label “wars” for this series of discussions, mostly one-sided and mostly located within the academy, is something of an overblown metaphor. Nonetheless, I will suggest that there are some respects in which the metaphor is appropriate. The Science Wars involve territory, albeit a metaphorical kind of territory. They inspire work that can be best interpreted as ideological, a result of disciplinary interests. Moreover, fellow participants in the wars and others reward that ideological work.My goal in this is to display efforts to maintain a discipline's epistemic authority, the recognition that members of that discipline have legitimate claims to knowledge on a subject. The central section of the paper takes the form of a discussion of one recent contribution to the Science Wars, James Robert Brown's Who Rules in Science? My argument is at least somewhat generalizable beyond this book, and it therefore points to interesting phenomena related to epistemic authority
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Helen Longino (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press.
David Bloor (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. University of Chicago Press.
Sandra Harding (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives. Cornell University.
Bruno Latour & Steven Woolgar (1986). Laboratory Life; The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
Randall Collins (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
James Robert Brown (1998). Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science Part 1: Logic, Mathematics, Physics and History of Science Part 2: Biology, Psychology, Cognitive Science and Economics Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vols. 177 and 178 Mathieu Marion and Robert S. Cohen, Editors Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995–96, Vol. 1: Xi + 320 Pp., $180; Vol. 2: Xi +303 Pp., $154. [REVIEW] Dialogue 37 (3):620.
James Robert Brown (1985). Book Review:Science and Convention Jerzy Giedymin. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (1):168-.
Robert G. Hudson (2003). Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars. Dialogue 42 (3):616-617.
James Robert Brown (2005). Book Review The Science Wars. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):523-525.
Keith Parsons (2002). Critical Notice: Scientific Civilization and its Discontents: Further Reflections on the Science Wars. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):645-651.
Robert G. Hudson (2003). Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars James Robert Brown Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001, Xi + 236 Pp., $26.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 42 (03):616-.
James Robert Brown (2001). Who Rules in Science?: An Opinionated Guide to the Wars. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads17 ( #214,019 of 1,902,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #115,169 of 1,902,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?