David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231 (2007)
Internet plagiarism continues unabated and may even be increasing. Questions pertaining to the ethical-moral construct employed by students to justify Internet plagiarism among high school students have remained relatively untouched. Understanding not simply the prevalence of Internet plagiarism but also the variety of explanations used by students to justify their plagiarism seems crucial to curtailing its practice. In this study, I surveyed 160 high school students and endeavored to understand and describe the practices of students who use the Internet for schoolwork and who engage in copy-paste plagiarism or paper-buying practices. The results indicate that students are more easily able to justify copy-paste plagiarism for a variety of reasons that mirror justifications of other forms of conventional plagiarism. Most students indicated they would never purchase a paper for reasons ranging from fear of getting caught to more principled and nuanced ethical claims. Based on these results I also offer educators suggestions for refining assignments and evaluation methods.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mary Walker & Cynthia Townley (2012). Contract Cheating: A New Challenge for Academic Honesty? [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):27-44.
Gervas K. K. Lau, Allan H. K. Yuen & Jae Park (2013). Toward an Analytical Model of Ethical Decision Making in Plagiarism. Ethics and Behavior 23 (5):360-377.
Similar books and articles
Melinda Rosenberg (2011). Principled Autonomy and Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (1):61-69.
Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293 - 306.
Niall Hayes & Lucas D. Introna (2005). Cultural Values, Plagiarism, and Fairness: When Plagiarism Gets in the Way of Learning. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):213 – 231.
Lidija Bilic-Zulle, Josip Azman, Vedran Frkovic & Mladen Petrovecki (2008). Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students From Plagiarizing? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):139-147.
Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili (2011). Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Jason M. Stephens, Michael F. Young & Thomas Calabrese (2007). Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating. Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):233 – 254.
Rubén Comas-Forgas & Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud (2009). Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use? Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Cynthia Townley & Mitch Parsell (2004). Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):271-277.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #37,974 of 1,679,381 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #48,359 of 1,679,381 )
How can I increase my downloads?