David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Denis Alexander & Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), Biology and Ideology From Descartes to Dawkins. The University of Chicago Press (2010)
In the first half of the nineteenth century, race and science were interconnected. The emergence of a science of race has been mistakenly aligned with the spread of Darwinism across the imperial realms. The sciences were central to the identification of racial and national types and thus were an important part of the framework that upheld empire. Biology showed how races and peoples could be “improved,” providing a justification for rule by the supposedly superior colonizers and neutralizing the question of whether empire was moral. The fundamental synergies between race and empire emphasize the role of the study of the human body in European expansion from the very beginning. Before addressing race, empire, and biology before Darwinism, this chapter focuses on what might be called the Atlantic world of Europe, America, and to a lesser extent, the Caribbean and West Africa. It then looks at the greater Indian Ocean, stretching from the South Pacific to South Asia, to demonstrate how and why biology was globalized.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robin O. Andreasen (2004). The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 19 (3):425-442.
Richard Spilsbury (1974). Providence Lost: A Critique of Darwinism. Oxford University Press.
J. Arthur Thomson (1895). Book Review:Darwinism and Race Progress. John Berry Haycraft. [REVIEW] Ethics 5 (4):513-.
James Lennox (2008). Darwinism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cor Weele (1993). Metaphors and the Privileging of Causes. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4).
Quayshawn Spencer (2012). What 'Biological Racial Realism' Should Mean. Philosophical Studies 159 (2):181-204.
Lawrence Blum (2010). Racialized Groups. The Monist 93 (2):298-320.
A. J. Wells (1999). Rose's Homeodynamic Perspective is Not an Alternative to Neo-Darwinism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-912.
Davide Vecchi (2012). Taking Biology Seriously : Neo-Darwinism and its Many Challenges. In Martin H. Brinkworth & Friedel Weinert (eds.), Evolution 2.0: Implications of Darwinism in Philosophy and the Social and Natural Sciences. Springer
Peter T. Saunders (2003). Bricks Without Straw: Darwinism in the Social Sciences. Theoria 18 (3):259-272.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads1 ( #824,621 of 1,908,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #452,278 of 1,908,158 )
How can I increase my downloads?