Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):491-519 (2010)
|Abstract||In this essay I defend the view that Henry Sidgwick’s moral epistemology is a form of intuitionist foundationalism that grants common-sense morality no evidentiary role. In §1, I outline both the problematic of The Methods of Ethics and the main elements of its argument for utilitarianism. In §§2-4 I provide my interpretation of Sidgwick’s moral epistemology. In §§ 5-8 I refute rival interpretations, including the Rawlsian view that Sidgwick endorses some version of reflective equilibrium and the view that he is committed to some kind of pluralistic epistemology. In§ 9 I contend with some remaining objections to my view|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bart Schultz (ed.) (1992). Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge University Press.
Anthony Skelton (2010). On Sidgwick's Demise. Utilitas 22 (1):70-77.
David Phillips (2011). Sidgwickian Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Henry Sidgwick (2000). Essays on Ethics and Method. Oxford University Press.
Anthony Skelton (2008). Sidgwick's Philosophical Intuitions. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 10 (2):185-209.
Anthony Skelton (2011). Utilitarian Practical Ethics: Sidgwick and Singer. In Placido Bucolo, Roger Crisp & Bart Schultz (eds.), Henry Sidgwick: Ethics, Psychics, and Politics. Catania: University of Catania Press.
Francesco Orsi (2012). Sidgwick and the Morality of Purity. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 10 (10).
Anthony Skelton (2002). Henry Sidgwick, 1838-1900. In J. Mander & A. P. F. Sell (eds.), The Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century British Philosophers. Thoemmes Press.
Anthony Skelton (2006). Henry Sidgwick's Practical Ethics: A Defense. Utilitas 18 (3):199-217.
Anthony Skelton (2007). Schultz's Sidgwick. Utilitas 19 (1):91-103.
Added to index2009-12-11
Total downloads80 ( #9,676 of 548,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,209 of 548,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?