Graduate studies at Western
Utilitas 22 (1):70-77 (2010)
|Abstract||In ‘Sidgwick’s Epistemology’, John Deigh argues that Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ and that interest in it declined considerably after Sidgwick’s death because the epistemology on which it relied ‘increasingly became suspect in analytic philosophy and eventually [it was] discarded as obsolete’. In this article I dispute these claims.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Henry Sidgwick (2000). Essays on Ethics and Method. Oxford University Press.
Anthony Skelton (2010). Henry Sidgwick's Moral Epistemology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):491-519.
Anthony Skelton (2011). Utilitarian Practical Ethics: Sidgwick and Singer. In Placido Bucolo, Roger Crisp & Bart Schultz (eds.), Henry Sidgwick: Ethics, Psychics, and Politics. Catania: University of Catania Press.
John Deigh (2004). Sidgwick's Conception of Ethics. Utilitas 16 (2):168-183.
Anthony Skelton (2002). Henry Sidgwick, 1838-1900. In J. Mander & A. P. F. Sell (eds.), The Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century British Philosophers. Thoemmes Press.
Anthony Skelton (2006). Henry Sidgwick's Practical Ethics: A Defense. Utilitas 18 (3):199-217.
Anthony Skelton (2010). Henry Sidgwick, 1838-1900. In William Sweet (ed.), Biographical Encyclopedia of British Idealism. Continuum.
Francesco Orsi (2012). Sidgwick and the Morality of Purity. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 10 (10).
Anthony Skelton (2007). Schultz's Sidgwick. Utilitas 19 (1):91-103.
Added to index2009-12-11
Total downloads101 ( #7,708 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #8,395 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?