Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325 (2007)
|Abstract||Critical notice of Robert Audi's The Good in the Right in which doubts are raised about the epistemological and ethical doctrines it defends. It doubts that an appeal to Kant is a profitable way to defend Rossian normative intuitionism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Stalnaker (1988). Critical Notice. Mind 97 (385):117-128.
Bart Streumer (2005). Review of Robert Audi, The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005.
Lilly-Marlene Russow (1980). Audi on Mental Images. Inquiry 23 (September):353-356.
Paul Noordhof (2008). The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value - by Robert Audi. Philosophical Books 49 (2):175-178.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2007). The Good in the Right by Robert Audi. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):250-261.
Klemens Kappel (2002). Challenges to Audi's Ethical Intuitionism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):391-413.
Mark Timmons, John Greco & Alfred R. Mele (eds.) (2007). Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford University Press.
Candace Vogler (forthcoming). Some Remarks on Robert Audi's the Good in the Right. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Rationality and the Good. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #23,042 of 548,941 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #3,475 of 548,941 )
How can I increase my downloads?