The Lex Permissiva and the Source of Natural Right in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals and Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right
International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):375-398 (2009)
|Abstract||This article argues that Fichte is correct in claiming, as he does in the Foundations of Natural Right, that a derivation of the law of right from the moral law is impossible because the former relies on lex permissiva. I focus on Kant’s deduction of the concept of merely intelligible possession in the Metaphysics of Morals precisely because Kant attempts what Fichte says is not possible. By illustrating the problems involved in the concept of the lex permissiva, one is then in a position to see why Fichte believes the derivations mustremain separate and why Fichte stresses that the law of right must be argued for without reference to morality or the moral law|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fulvio Di Blasi (2006). God and the Natural Law: A Rereading of Thomas Aquinas. St. Augustine's Press.
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (2000). Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Cambridge University Press.
S. J. (2000). Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex. Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.
Douglas Moggach (2000). The Construction of Juridical Space. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:201-209.
Benjamin D. Crowe (2010). Fichte's Transcendental Theology. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 92 (1):68-88.
Michael Nance (2012). Recognition, Freedom, and the Self in Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
J. S. Russell (2000). Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex. Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433 - 449.
James Clarke (2011). Hegel's Critique of Fichte in the 1802/3 Essay on Natural Right. Inquiry 54 (3):207 - 225.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Immanuel Kant (1949/1976). Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. Garland Pub..
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
David James (2011). Fichte's Social and Political Philosophy: Property and Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence Pasternack (ed.) (2002). Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Focus. Routledge.
James Messina (2011). Answering Aenesidemus: Schulze's Attack on Reinholdian Representationalism and its Importance for Fichte. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):339-369.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?