The Emergence and Evolution of Stakeholder Activism and Firm Responses During Social Issue Life-Cycle
Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:495-507 (2008)
|Abstract||Due to increasing stakeholder activism, several firms have recently been driven into a conflict with stakeholders resulting in unexpected consequences. Based on an in-depth case study of a conflict between a forest industry company and environmental activist groups, we develop a framework for analysing the emergence and consequences of a stakeholder conflict. We argue that a conflict ina stakeholder relationship effects not only to this particular stakeholder relationship, but it also evokes dynamic changes in the stakeholder network of the firm including the emergence of new pressuring stakeholders, the complication of the original conflicting issue, and the emergence of new conflicts in the stakeholder network. We contend that the network effects of stakeholder conflictescalation are particularly critical issue in the relationships with activist groups and other “secondary” stakeholders|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kalle Pajunen (2010). A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):27-32.
Julia Roloff (2008). Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250.
Dominic Kaeslin (2007). Structure and Agency in Firm-Stakeholder Networks. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:443-447.
Benjamin A. Neville & Bulent Menguc (2006). Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions Between Stakeholders. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (4):377 - 391.
David Saiia & Vananh le (2009). A Map Leading to Less Waste. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:302-313.
Mario Minoja (2012). Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):67-82.
Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen & Hanna Lehtimäki (2012). Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):53-65.
Matias Laine (2010). The Nature of Nature as a Stakeholder. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):73-78.
Brian Harvey & Anja Schaefer (2001). Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):243 - 260.
José A. Plaza-Úbeda, Jerónimo de Burgos-Jiménez & Eva Carmona-Moreno (2010). Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):419-442.
Dominic Kaeslin, Ruth Schmitt & Jerry Calton (2007). Decentered Stakeholder Theory. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:448-452.
Neil A. Shankman (1999). Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):319 - 334.
Marc Lampe (2001). Mediation as an Ethical Adjunct of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):165 - 173.
Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What Do We Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):65-72.
Jacob Brower & Vijay Mahajan (2013). Driven to Be Good: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on the Drivers of Corporate Social Performance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):313-331.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #292,723 of 738,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?