The operational analysis of psychological terms

Psychological Review 52 (4):270-78 (1945)
The major contributions of operationism have been negative, largely because operationists failed to distinguish logical theories of reference from empirical accounts of language. Behaviorism never finished an adequate formulation of verbal reports and therefore could not convincingly embrace subjective terms. But verbal responses to private stimuli can arise as social products through the contingencies of reinforcement arranged by verbal communities
Keywords awareness   behavior   verbal   behaviorism   methodological   behaviorism   radical   operationism   philosophy of psychology   private events   reference   semantics   subjectivity–objectivity   verbal community
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    D. M. Armstrong (1971). Meaning and Communication. Philosophical Review 80 (4):427-447.
    Jonathan Bennett (1975). Stimulus, Response, Meaning. American Philosophical Quarterly 9:55-88.

    View all 30 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    M. Kusch (1997). The Sociophilosophy of Folk Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (1):1-25.
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    1 ( #306,312 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.