Are shapes intrinsic?

Philosophical Studies 133 (1):111 - 130 (2007)
Abstract
It is widely believed that shapes are intrinsic properties. But this claim is hard to defend. I survey all known theories of shape properties, and argue that each theory is either incompatible with the claim that shapes are intrinsic, or can be shown to be false.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy of Religion   Philosophy of Mind   Epistemology   Logic   Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,476
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Lewis (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):343-377.
Josh Parsons (2007). 7. Theories of Location. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:201.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Antony Eagle (2016). Multiple Location Defended. Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2215-2231.
Daniel Giberman (2014). Tropes in Space. Philosophical Studies 167 (2):453-472.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

102 ( #40,671 of 1,911,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

13 ( #45,949 of 1,911,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.