Liberalism as free thought
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
John Stuart Mill is the philosopher of liberalism. Or so some people think. Others disagree; they may give that status to Locke, or (perhaps) to Kant. Or they may think the question frivolous and insist – boringly but, I cannot deny, sensibly – that no one thinker is the philosopher of liberalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maurice Cowling (1990). Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Ben Colburn (2010). Autonomy and Liberalism. Routledge.
Gertrude Himmelfarb (1974/1990). On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network.
John Skorupski (2006). Why Read Mill Today. Routledge.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Struan Jacobs (1990). Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism. Critical Review 4 (3):365-375.
Michael Forster, The Liberal Temper in Classical German Philosophy: Freedom of Thought and Expression.
Jason Brennan & John Tomasi (2012). Classical Liberalism. In David Estlund (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Usa. 115.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?