Philosophers' Imprint 8 (10):1-14 (2008)
|Abstract||Local versions of the (special) principle of relativity say that if the same type of experiment is conducted in two isolated, unaccelerated laboratories, then the outcomes of those experiments must be the same. Global versions of the principle say that if you take a physically possible world and boost the entire material content of that world, you get another physically possible world. Some authors say that the local and the global principles are logically independent, and that the local version is more important. These authors are wrong. I argue that the global version entails the local version, and discuss why a counterexample to this entailment offered by Tim Budden fails|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jacques Demaret, Michael Heller & Dominique Lambert (1997). Local and Global Properties of the World. Foundations of Science 2 (1):137-176.
Koichiro Matsuno & Stanley N. Salthe (1995). Global Idealism/Local Materialism. Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):309-337.
Sirkku K. Hellsten (2008). Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality? Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):70-81.
V. Kolev & J. Yordanova (2000). The Position of Event-Related EEG Activity in the Local/Global Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):407-407.
J. Brian Pitts, Some Thoughts on Relativity and the Flow of Time: Einstein's Equations Given Absolute Simultaneity.
Mario Castagnino & Olimpia Lombardi (2009). The Global Non-Entropic Arrow of Time: From Global Geometrical Asymmetry to Local Energy Flow. Synthese 169 (1):1 - 25.
Stephen Maitzen (2006). The Impossibility of Local Skepticism. Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,297 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?