Phronesis 54 (4):346-370 (2009)
|Abstract||Some scholars have claimed that Aristotle uses the word " stasis " to refer to any sort of conflict in the political realm, covering everything from civil-war to social rivalry. After developing an interpretation of Politics V.1-4, where Aristotle discusses the topic at length, I argue that he is in fact carefully delimiting the concept of stasis so that it applies only to civil-war and open sedition, showing how his analysis excludes partisan antipathy, legal disputes, and political competition. I conclude with some reflections on the significance of this position: by defining stasis narrowly, Aristotle not only offers a profound critique of Plato's theory of regime change, but adopts a position that allows his political philosophy to be relevant for modern theories requiring acceptance rather than rejection of conflict in the political realm.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Kraut (2002). Aristotle: Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (1997). Politics: Books VII and VIII. Clarendon Press.
Andrés Rosler (2005). Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
Corey Abel (2005). Appropriating Aristotle. In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott.
Khalil M. Habib (2010). Aristotle on Stasis. Ancient Philosophy 30 (1):190-193.
Aristotle (1999). Aristotle: Politics, Books V and VI. Clarendon Press.
Fred Dycus Miller (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's Politics. Oxford University Press.
Kevin M. Cherry (2012). Plato, Aristotle and the Purpose of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Salkever (2007). Whose Prayer? The Best Regime of Book 7 and the Lessons of Aristotle's "Politics". Political Theory 35 (1):29 - 46.
Added to index2009-10-03
Total downloads37 ( #31,927 of 549,071 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,071 )
How can I increase my downloads?