David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Italian writers of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, notably Pacioli (1494), Tartaglia (1556), and Cardan (1545), had discussed the problem of the division of a stake between two players whose game was interrupted before its close. The problem was proposed to Pascal and Fermat, probably in 1654, by the Chevalier de M´er´e, a gambler who is said to have had unusual ability “even for the mathematics.” The correspondence which ensued between Fermat and Pascal, was fundamental in the development of modern concepts of probability, and it is unfortunate that the introductory letter from Pascal to Fermat is no longer extant. The one here translated, written in 1654, appears in the Œuvres de Fermat (ed. Tannery and Henry, Vol. II, pp. 288–314, Paris 1894) and serves to show the nature of the problem
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Franklin, Home | Archives | Announcements | About the Journal | Submission Information | Contact Us.
Doug Jesseph, Home | Archives | Announcements | About the Journal | Submission Information | Contact Us.
Bryan W. Roberts (2011). How Galileo Dropped the Ball and Fermat Picked It Up. Synthese 180 (3):337-356.
Hans-Martin Gaertner (2003). Huygens' Principle: A Case Against Optimality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):779-781.
Paul J. H. Schoemaker (2003). Huygens Versus Fermat: No Clear Winner. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):781-782.
Colin Mclarty (2010). What Does It Take to Prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the Logic of Number Theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):359-377.
Greg Janzen (2011). Pascal's Wager and the Nature of God. Sophia 50 (3):331-344.
Gregory Mougin & Elliott Sober (1994). Betting Against Pascal's Wager. Noûs 28 (3):382-395.
Alan Hájek, Pascal's Wager. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Yvon Gauthier (2008). From Fermat to Gauss. [REVIEW] Dialogue 47 (2):411-414.
Virgil Martin Nemoianu (2010). The Insufficiency of the Many Gods Objection to Pascal's Wager. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):513-530.
Nick Bostrom (2009). Pascal's Mugging. Analysis 69 (3):443-445.
Erkka Maula & Eero Kasanen (1989). Cher Fermat A.D. 1637. Philosophica 43:127-162.
Added to index2011-09-17
Total downloads30 ( #126,342 of 1,790,292 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,312 of 1,790,292 )
How can I increase my downloads?