Phenomenology of Bodily Integrity in Disfiguring Breast Cancer

Hypatia 27 (2):281-300 (2012)
In this paper, I explore the meaning of bodily integrity in disfiguring breast cancer. Bodily integrity is a normative principle precisely because it does not simply refer to actual physical or functional intactness. It rather indicates what should be regarded and respected as inviolable in vulnerable and damageable bodies. I will argue that this normative inviolability or wholeness can be based upon a person's embodied experience of wholeness. This phenomenological stance differs from the liberal view that identifies respect for integrity with respect for autonomy (resulting in an invalidation of bodily integrity's proper normative meaning), as well as from the view that bodily integrity is based upon ideologies of wholeness (which runs the risk of being disadvantageous to women). I propose that bodily integrity involves a process of identification between the experience of one's body as “Leib” and the experience of one's body as “Körper.” If identification fails or is not possible, one's integrity is threatened. This idea of bodily integrity can support breast cancer patients and survivors in making decisions about possible corrective interventions. To implement this idea in oncology care, empirical-phenomenological research needs to establish how breast cancer patients express their embodied self-experiences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01261.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carolyn McLeod (2005). How to Distinguish Autonomy From Integrity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):107 - 133.
Greg Scherkoske (2010). Integrity and Moral Danger. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):335-358.
Carol V. A. Quinn (2009). On Integrity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):189-197.
Daryl Koehn (2005). Integrity as a Business Asset. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):125 - 136.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

36 ( #131,209 of 1,941,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #272,623 of 1,941,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.