David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681 (2008)
Pragmatism is often thought to be incompatible with realism, the view that there are knowable mind-independent facts, objects, or properties. In this article, I show that there are, in fact, realist versions of pragmatism and argue that a realist pragmatism of the right sort can make important contributions to such fields as religious ethics and philosophy of religion. Using William James's pragmatism as my primary example, I show (1) that James defended realist and pluralist views in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and philosophy of religion, and (2) that these views not only cohere with his pragmatism but indeed are basic to it. After arguing that James's pragmatism provides a credible and useful approach to a number of basic philosophical and religious issues, I conclude by reflecting on some ways in which we can apply and potentially improve James's views in the study of religion
|Keywords||William James pragmatism religious ethics realism philosophy of religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nancy Frankenberry (1999). Review: Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism, and Religion. [REVIEW] Process Studies 28 (3/4).
William James (1907/1995). Pragmatism. Dover Publications.
Larry A. Hickman (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons From John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
John Dewey (1905). The Realism of Pragmatism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (12):324-327.
Jon Avery (1993). Three Types of American Neo-Pragmatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:1-13.
Robert J. Roth (1998). Radical Pragmatism: An Alternative. Fordham University Press.
James Rowland Angell (1908). Book Review: Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. William James. [REVIEW] Ethics 18 (2):226-.
Michael R. Slater (2009). William James on Ethics and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #63,134 of 1,098,785 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,088 of 1,098,785 )
How can I increase my downloads?