The imagery debate: Déjà vu all over again? Commentary on Zenon Pylyshyn
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):209-210 (2002)
|Abstract||The imagery debate re-enacts controversies persisting since Descartes. The controversy remains important less for what we can learn about visual imagery than about cognitive science itself. In the tradition of Arnauld, Reid, Bartlett, Austin and Ryle, Pylyshyn’s critique exposes notorious mistakes being unwittingly rehearsed not only regarding imagery but also in several independent domains of research in modern cognitive science.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zenon W. Pylyshyn (1973). What the Mind's Eye Tells the Mind's Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery. Psychology Bulletin 80:1-24.
Jozsef A. Toth (2002). When is Enough Enough? The Integration of Competing Scientific Agendas. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):212-213.
Evan Thompson (2007). Look Again: Phenomenology and Mental Imagery. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2).
Ian Gold (2002). Interpreting the Neuroscience of Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):190-191.
Nigel J. T. Thomas (1994). The Imagery Debate. [REVIEW] Journal of Mind and Behavior 15:291-294.
Stephen M. Kosslyn, William L. Thompson & Giorgio Ganis (2002). Mental Imagery Doesn't Work Like That. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):198-200.
Gianfranco Dalla Barba, Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti (2002). The Nature of Mental Imagery: How Null is the “Null Hypothesis”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):187-188.
Zenon W. Pylyshyn (1981). The Imagery Debate: Analog Media Vs. Tacit Knowledge. Psychological Review 88 (December):16-45.
Peter P. Slezak (2002). The Imagery Debate: Déjà-Vu All Over Again? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):209-210.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #33,071 of 549,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?