Correspondence
The Classical Review 29 (03):95- (1915)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
D. Patterson (2003). What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth? Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Patricia Marino (2006). What Should a Correspondence Theory Be and Do? Philosophical Studies 127 (3):415 - 457.
David Pearce & Veikko Rantala (1983). Correspondence as an Intertheory Relation. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):363 - 371.
Schick (1985). In Defense of the Correspondence Theory. Philosophy Research Archives 11:319-334.
Jon Barwise & Lawrence S. Moss (1998). Modal Correspondence for Models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (3):275-294.
Kenneth F. Schaffner (1969). Correspondence Rules. Philosophy of Science 36 (3):280-290.
E. S. de Beer (ed.) (2010). The Correspondence of John Locke, Volume 1: Introduction, Letters 1-461. OUP Oxford.
Antonio Grappone (2010). Girolamo e l'epistolario tra Seneca e san Paolo. Augustinianum 50 (1):119-145.
Douglas Patterson (2004). Correspondence and Metaphysics: Andrew Newman's the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Inquiry 47 (5):490 – 504.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-06Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

