David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):183-195 (2004)
We care for our own future experiences. Most of us, trivially, would rather have them pleasurable than painful. When we care for our own future experiences we do so in a way that is different from the way we care for those of others (which is not to say that we necessarily care more about our own experience). Prereflectively, one would think this is because these experiences will be ours and no one else's. But then, of course, we need to explain what it means to say that a future experience will be mine and how knowledge of this fact renders it rational for me to care for this experience in a special way. Indeed most philosophers take this route. But in doing so, they quickly stumble on insuperable problems. I shall argue that the problem of egocentric care, as it is sometimes called, can be solved by turning things upside down: it is much more fruitful to think that the special kind of care we feel for some future experiences (and not others) is part of what makes them ours should they occur. This requires an explanation of egocentric care for future experiences that does not draw in a theory of personal identity, but rather contributes to one. I will attempt to provide this explanation by making use of the idea of a diachronic mental holism.
|Keywords||Care Egocentrism Experience Future Holism Metaphysics Perry, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Taylor (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971). Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Marya Schechtman (1996). The Constitution of Selves. Cornell University Press.
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1966). 'He': A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness. Ratio 8 (December):130-157.
Bernard A. O. Williams (1957). Personal Identity and Individuation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67:229-52.
Citations of this work BETA
Catriona Mackenzie (2007). Bare Personhood? Velleman on Selfhood. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):263 – 282.
Similar books and articles
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Health Care, Capabilities, and Ai Assistive Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181 - 190.
Matthew Noah Smith (2013). The Importance of What They Care About. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):297-314.
Christopher Groves (2009). Future Ethics: Risk, Care and Non-Reciprocal Responsibility. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (1):17 – 31.
Aimee Wynsberghe (2013). Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Jocelyn C. White & Janine Sarti (1993). The Transfer of Patients' Ethics Information Among Cooperating Institutions: A Future Function of Ethics Networks. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 5 (6):362-367.
Joseph Raz (2004). The Role of Well‐Being. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):269–294.
Martin Woods (2011). An Ethic of Care in Nursing: Past, Present and Future Considerations. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3):266-276.
Elin Palm (2013). Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care. Health Care Analysis 21 (2):171-188.
Daniel Callahan (2000). Judging the Future: Whose Fault Will It Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #117,838 of 1,792,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,792,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?