David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1992)
In this book, Slote offers the first full-scale foundational account of virtue ethics to have appeared since the recent revival of interest in the ethics of virtue. Slote advocates a particular form of such ethics for its intuitive and structural advantages over Kantianism, utilitarianism, and common-sense morality, and he argues that the problems of other views can be avoided and a contemporary plausible version of virtue ethics achieved only by abandoning specifically moral concepts for general aretaic notions like admirability and virtue. Although this study is not bound by particular Aristotelian doctrines, it places an Aristotelian emphasis on both self-benefiting and other-benefiting virtues. Slote criticizes Kantian and common-sense morality for internal incoherencies and for downgrading the moral individual and her well-being in some previously unnoticed ways. By contrast, this book defends a distinctive, intuitive, and symmetric ethical principle according to which we should balance self-concern with concern for others, but it also concludes that there is, contrary to utilitarianism, no single basis for status as a virtue nor any simple relation between the virtues and human well-being.
|Keywords||Ethics Virtue Common sense Utilitarianism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$27.18 used (46% off) $37.00 new (26% off) $50.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1012.S5165 1992|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Angela M. Smith (2008). Control, Responsibility, and Moral Assessment. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):367 - 392.
Simon Keller (2007). Virtue Ethics is Self-Effacing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):221 – 231.
Jarek Gryz (2011). On the Relationship Between the Aretaic and the Deontic. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):493-501.
Daniel Doviak (2011). A New Form of Agent-Based Virtue Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):259-272.
Gregory F. Mellema (2010). Moral Ideals and Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):173-180.
Similar books and articles
Michael Slote (2010). Virtue Ethics. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge. 325--347.
Roger Crisp (ed.) (1996). How Should One Live?: Essays on the Virtues. Oxford University Press.
Michael Slote (2004). Driver's Virtues. Utilitas 16 (1):22-32.
Aaron Quinn (2007). Moral Virtues for Journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):168 – 186.
J. Moreh (1992). Economic Analysis, Common-Sense Morality and Utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 37 (1):115 - 143.
Michael A. Slote (2010). Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Henry Sidgwick (1901/2009). Methods of Ethics. Kaplan Pub..
Michael Slote (2007). Famine, Affluence, and Virtue. In Rebecca L. Walker & P. J. Ivanhoe (eds.), Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Oxford University Press.
Nafsika Athanassoulis (2005). Common-Sense Virtue Ethics and Moral Luck. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):265 - 276.
Roger Crisp & Michael A. Slote (eds.) (1997). Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #27,914 of 1,088,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #15,139 of 1,088,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?