David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 12 (1-4):317-38 (1969)
The Theory of Important Criteria is used to argue that the age?old problem of the compatibility of free will and determinism turns on the question of the importance of causal indeterminacy of choice as a criterion of being able to do otherwise. One's answer to this question depends in turn on one's evaluation of certain moral issues and of the force and significance of certain similes, analogies and diagrams in terms of which one can ?depict? a deterministic universe. It is further argued that the problem of free will and determinism is not a pseudo?problem, but a genuine problem that is hard to solve because of the depth and complexity of the evaluative issues on which it hangs
|Keywords||Causality Choice Criteria Determinism Free Will Metaphysics Value Smart, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
R. E. Hobart (1934). Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It. Mind 43 (169):1-27.
J. J. C. Smart (1963). Free Will, Praise and Blame. Mind 70 (279):291-306.
J. J. C. Smart (1961). Free-Will, Praise and Blame. Mind 70 (279):291-306.
C. A. Campbell (1951). Is `Freewill' a Pseudo-Problem? Mind 60 (240):441-465.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marvin Zimmerman (1966). Is Free Will Incompatible with Determinism? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (March):415-420.
Peter van Inwagen (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Kadri Vihvelin (2008). Arguments for Incompatibilism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Charles B. Guignon (2002). Ontological Presuppositions of the Determinism--Free Will Debate. In Harald Atmanspacher & Robert C. Bishop (eds.), Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Thorverton UK: Imprint Academic 321--338.
Galen Strawson (1989). Consciousness, Free Will, and the Unimportance of Determinism. Inquiry 32 (March):3-27.
Ted Honderich (2002). How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press 249.
Noa Latham (2004). Determinism, Randomness, and Value. Philosophical Topics 32 (1-2):153-167.
Richard Arneson (2007). The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility and Desert. In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and Justice. Clarendon Press
Philippa Foot (1957). Free Will as Involving Determinism. Philosophical Review 66 (October):439-50.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #183,025 of 1,926,202 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #330,531 of 1,926,202 )
How can I increase my downloads?