David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 11 (1-4):101 – 113 (1968)
In an article in Mind (Vol. 73, No. 291, July 1964) I tried to show that there is a fundamental difference between primary and secondary qualities. The present analysis of perceived size of an object and its relation to the size of the 'objective' and the 'real' object reveals that my thesis 1 regarding visual primary qualities, viz. size and shape, while true so far as shape is concerned, has to be modified in regard to size. After having criticized the usual view of size constancy, I show by means of a diagram how we may determine the location in physical space of a percept of an object. This diagram reveals at the same time how perceived size decreases gradually with increasing distance of the object from the percipient, but at a much smaller rate than the retinal image of the object. By means of the diagram I show furthermore how the perceived size may in theory vary from person to person. In conclusion a modification of my thesis 1 is suggested.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Norwood Russell Hanson (1960). On Having the Same Visual Experiences. Mind 69 (July):340-350.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jan Krajiček (1994). Lower Bounds to the Size of Constant-Depth Propositional Proofs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):73-86.
Helen E. Ross (2001). Berkeley, Helmholtz, the Moon Illusion, and Two Visual Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Stevan Harnad (2005). To Cognize is to Categorize: Cognition is Categorization. In C. Lefebvre & H. Cohen (eds.), Handbook of Categorization. Elsevier
Charles S. Cockell (2008). Environmental Ethics and Size. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Brendan Maher (1998). When the Coefficient Hits the Clinic: Effect Size and the Size of the Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):211-211.
David J. Bennett (2011). How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):345-365.
Francisco Aboitiz (1998). To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
John Morreall (1978). Size, Shape, Seeing, and Sense-Data. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):101-112.
J. Bogaert (2001). Size Dependence of Interior-to-Edge Ratios: Size Predominates Shape. Acta Biotheoretica 49 (2):121-123.
Helen E. Ross (2003). Neurological Models of Size Scaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads3 ( #620,721 of 1,907,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,221 of 1,907,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?