David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 14 (2):171–184 (2001)
This essay critically examines Joseph Rouse's arguments against, what he dubs, the "legitimation project", which are the attempts to delimit and justify the scientific enterprise by means of global, "a priori" principles. Stipulating that a more adequate picture of science can be obtained by viewing it as a continuously transforming pattern of situated activities, Rouse believes that only by refocusing attention upon the actual practice of science can philosophers begin to detach themselves from the irresolvable epistemological problems that have remained the primary byproduct of the traditional philosophical approach. On closer inspection, however, Rouse's project appears susceptible to the criticism that it is either too relativistic to do the work he envisioned for it, or that it participates in the very same legitimation venture that it was intended to replace (in addition to its own brand metaphysical/epistemological problems). This unexpected outcome, moreover, suggests that such legitimation projects may be an integral component of the very practice of science, contrary to Rouse estimate.
|Keywords||scientific legitimation scientific demarcation scientific practice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jiri Priban (2003). Legalist Fictions and the Problem of Scientific Legitimation. Ratio Juris 16 (1):14-36.
Lars Samuelsson (2010). On the Demarcation Problem and the Possibility of Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 32 (3):247-265.
Robert L. Morris (1987). Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem. Inquiry 30 (3):241 – 251.
B. D. (2000). A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
Robert T. Pennock (2011). Can't Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion? Demarcation Revisited. Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger. Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115.
Edward Slowik (1999). In Praise of the Legitimation Project. Philosophia 27 (3-4):599-612.
Kirsten Walsh (2009). Has Laudan Killed the Demarcation Problem? Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Joseph Rouse (1994). Engaging Science Through Cultural Studies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:396 - 401.
Francis Remedios (2003). Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #410,593 of 1,932,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #332,993 of 1,932,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?