Why some machines may need qualia and how they can have them (Including a demanding new Turing test for robot philosophers.)

Abstract

Many debates about consciousness appear to be endless, in part because of conceptual confusions preventing clarity as to what the issues are and what does or does not count as evidence. This makes it hard to decide what should go into a machine if it is to be described as 'conscious'. Thus, triumphant demonstrations by some AI developers may be regarded by others as proving nothing of interest because the system does not satisfy *their* definitions or requirements specifications.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Turing's two tests for intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 1999 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.
Can a machine be conscious? How?Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4-5):67-75.
Undecidability in the imitation game.Y. Sato & T. Ikegami - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
Accelerating Turing machines.B. Jack Copeland - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (2):281-300.
Who's afraid of the Turing test?Dale Jacquette - 1993 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (2):63-74.
The Turing test.B. Jack Copeland - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Turing test: 50 years later.Ayse Pinar Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Benny Shanon - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
129 (#136,639)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?